Twitter UpdatesMy Tweets
Digesting the lowest rung of pop culture so you don't have to!
Goin’ green! Goin’ Solo! This week, it is just Nick as he discusses the 2011 superhero film Green Lantern starring Ryan Reynolds! He discusses all of the cons and manages to even find a pro! Will this one-person episode work? Download the episode to find out!
To listen to the episode, click here or on the image below.
This year’s Flash Annual steps outside the current story arc (“Reverse”) and gives readers a one-off tale. Now, at first glance, that might make it seem like it is throwaway filler. However, the main story explores not only the relationship between Barry and his best friend, Hal “Green Lantern” Jordan, but gives us the details of their very first meeting (in the New 52).
The Flash/Green Lantern pairing has always been a key partnership within the history of DC Comics. The most famous pairing is that of Barry and Hal, but the legacy characters Flash and Green Lantern have spawned have also been literary partners.
It was kind of neat. A little bizarre – Flash and Green Lantern find themselves battling in an alien arena – but the banter was really light and a lot of fun. Writer Brian Buccellato did an excellent job of defining the relationship between these two characters. They know each other’s tricks and quirks and can call each other out directly on their crap while not taking offense. The sense of this friendship is wonderfully done.
I guess what also helps is that, by design, Barry and Hal are completely opposite from one another. Barry is very cautious while Hal is completely reckless. That makes for wonderful conflict and comedy. I cracked up when, upon their first meeting, Barry confuses Hal for Superman and, later, Hal seeing through and outing Barry’s secret identity (all the while Barry is trying to maintain it). I don’t really read Justice League where Hal and Barry are both featured, so I cannot comment how their relationship is displayed there, but here, it is fun to read.
There was one element I found to be a bit odd in the story. Hal and Barry learn that they are in a gladiatorial fight to the death. It is literally said that the fight is “to the death”. Naturally, our heroes win. So does that mean they killed all their competition? Or was it a fight to the death in name only? This is not touched upon in anyway. Normally, I wouldn’t care about such a thing, but the characters of Flash and Green Lantern are generally non-lethal. Their fun banter would seem out of place if they suddenly had to kill a bunch of folks, no?
The art in the main story was done by Sam Basri who has a very different, yet complimentary style to series regular artist Francis Manapul (who sat this annual out). I really liked Basri’s work, and I wouldn’t mind seeing him coming back as a fill-in or eventual replacement on the Flash title (not that I want to see Manapul go anytime soon, but no creator is on a book forever).
In the back-up story, “Details”, written by Nicole Dubuc, we find the Flash dealing with a man threatening to blow up a building who is angry with the speedster for not saving his wife years earlier. This was a really interesting slice-of-life story that examines how the small decisions in life can have lasting effects on those around us.
I really enjoyed the low-key nature of the story. It never got over-sentimental or schmaltzy. It found the right balance to carry out its, relatively simple story. I liked it on that level. Because of this, I now want to see out more of Dubuc’s work.
It also, perhaps unintentionally, played into Barry’s ability to “see” different outcomes of events using his “speed mind” abilities. While that power is not present in the story, the tale does play with the idea that “we can’t steer the outcome of every possibility”.
The art by Cully Hamner did not do much for me. It was a bit too rough for my eye to really adjust to it. I do not think I would like it had it been the entire issue, but as a shorter tale such as this, it did not outstay its welcome.
Overall, The Flash Annual #2 was a solid issue. It is good for people looking for a fun Flash story without worrying about not understanding what is going on. As I have said previously, there are many ways to do an annual. This was one of them, and it was successful.
Comic book eras are divided into “ages”. Comics of the 1930s and ‘40s are from the “Golden Age”. Comics from the ‘50s to mid-‘70s are part of the “Silver Age”. The “Bronze Age” is generally considered to be from the mid-‘70s to the mid-’80s. There really has not been a designation for comics from the late ’80s to now; it is given a general “Modern Age” moniker. However, given the way comic fans on the internet react in terms of seemingly hating everything based solely on small plot blurbs and rumors, I have seen some refer to now as the “Jade Age” since people are completely jaded about the industry.
Thing is, the whole overreaction to stuff on the internet is completely ridiculous. There is absolutely no need for it. You can dislike directions or story lines, but the hyperbolic negativity is completely out of hand. It seems like any decision DC or Marvel Comics make is met with overwhelming hostility. “Superman no longer wears red trunks! Screw you DC!” Seriously, who cares that much?
I suppose I can understand not taking change well. The hyperbolic reaction is stupid, but I understand it on a fundamental level. The bigger problem I have is when people bitch and moan about sketchy, unconfirmed rumors, and then, when the rumors turn out to be false, one of two things happen: 1) The internet feels they won by the company caving into their demands. I am just going to say this is horribly misguided. People on the internet overstate their ability to change things in popular entertainment; or 2) complain that editorial are wussed out by caving into fan demands. In short, there is no winning.
And, I think that is the key thing to remember: there is no winning for these companies. I am not going to stand here and say DC and Marvel are perfect. They aren’t and both have their fair-share of issues they are dealing with. However, people are so willing to bash them for as little a reason as possible that all rational thinking goes out the window.
For example, a few months ago, comic writer Gail Simone was reported to have been fired off Batgirl. Her online legion of fans went ballistic and shortly thereafter she was allegedly rehired. Simone’s fanbase ridiculed DC for back-peddling (seriously – what do fans want?). But, here is the thing about all of that: it was never once officially announced anywhere that she was fired/rehired. There was indeed a guest writer for two issues of Batgirl (which was later revealed by DC that it was a case of Simone being behind on her work).
All of that was merely a rumor (with some non-confirming tweets by Simone – she never actually said she was fired) and caught on like fire with the internet. Fans refused to believe the official story (I sort of believe that Simone had a “talking to” and, considering her online fanbase, went to the ‘net to stir things up – a theory that fits the actual revealed facts) because the rumor is so much juicier to believe and it gives them something to villainize.
However, the real sinners to all of it are sensationalist bloggers who like to play on fan’s hopes and fears. Specifically, people like Rich Johnston of Bleeding Cool fame. I have a love/hate relationship with this site. On one hand, Johnston does get some good scoops now and then. On the other, he clearly fans the flames of half-truths and outright rumors to drive up ad revenue through clicks. Also, his blatant bias against DC is grating in its obviousness.
A perfect example of this just happened within the last few days. Comic writer Joshua Hale Fialkov walked off his recently announced assignments of Green Lantern Corps and Red Lanterns. Bleeding Cool reported that this was due to an editorial edict to kill off the character of John Stewart. Nowhere in Fialkov’s announcement tweet or in any of DC’s announcements was this cited as the reason. Bleeding Cool had a “high profile” source. The internet exploded in rage because of this (never mind the fact that the character has allegedly added nothing to the comic for a number of years and death in comics is never permanent).
Today, other writers from the other Green Lantern books reported that the death of Stewart was never in the works and that the story was completely false. Of course, Bleeding Cool refused to be proven wrong, so Johnston inferred an editorial change back and affirmed that the change was due to BC’s readers response to the news. This is completely irresponsible reporting.
Of course, the idea that this was never the actual plan did not cross anyone’s mind. What is truly sickening is that in the discussion thread connected to Bleeding Cool’s article has people just eating it up feeling like they are the victorious keyboard warriors. Additionally, they are already mocking DC for changing their decision (again, cannot win), and are looking forward to how DC is going to eventually spin it.
The “Jade Age” indeed.
Continued from Part 3:
Hal learns that Parallax is coming to Earth (shit…I completely forgot about him!), so he heads to Planet X-Box for help. However, because the Green Lantern Corps are bigots, they refuse (even though it is their job to stop stuff like this). Hal then asks for permission to do it himself which they grant, but since he’s had the ring the entire time without anyone caring it begs the question on why he went to Oa in the first place. The scene added nothing. They don’t give him any help. They don’t give him any tools to fight. Just a “Good Luck”.
Honestly, why do they not want to defend Earth? Not only is it their job, but it gives them a strategic advantage. They know where the bad guy is going to be! Can’t they devise some sort of surprise attack? Why are they completely fine with Parallax destroying all life on Earth (especially since destroying such life will make Parallax strong enough to destroy the Green Lantern Corps)?
Hal returns to Earth where Hector has kidnapped Carol and reveals that he turned to evil partially because he was jealous of Hal’s lifestyle. Interesting message.
Hal gets Carol out of trouble just as Parallax arrives and kills Hammond for his failures (thereby making Hammond ultimately pointless in the grand scheme of things).
Parallax then starts to invade the city and, presumably kills thousands inadvertently making this movie much more horrific than the filmmakers probably intended. The problem with all of this is that we never learn what any of the ramifications from any of this are. Wouldn’t the government and the world population be going nuts that a giant evil cloud was vaporizing thousands. We get nothing. The next time we are back on Earth, all seems fine. Granted, we’d be opening up a giant can of worms if the movie dealt with what came next. The fact that it isn’t even mentioned seems troubling.
Hal confronts it and eventually gets it to go off planet. A chase ensues and, because the movie has no sense of how our solar system is arranged, Hal and Parallax make their way from Earth to the Asteroid Belt and then the sun in under two minutes.
Hal is able to get the evil cloud to fall into the sun. Thank goodness for Kilowog’s completely forgettable line of common knowledge (which wasn’t even referenced here – Hal comes up with this idea under a completely different rationale).
Now, as an aside, I am not saying that this wasn’t challenging. But it seemed as if Hal took down Parallax a bit too easily on his own. I mean, afterall, all Hal did was punch Parallax into the sun.
Remember how Parallax was built up earlier by killing off the “strongest Lanterns” who were acting as a team (all of whom were, presumably, Green Lanterns for more than a day). It was also implied that Parallax was much stronger when he faced Hal than he was in that earlier battle. Who knew punching a cloud was the key to victory?
So, Sinestro, Kilowg, and Tomar-Re arrive right after the battle finishes – nice timing guys – and bring Hal back to Oa where Hal becomes Employee of the Month. Also Kilowg takes credit for training Hal. What training? You just punched him a bunch of times and reminded him about gravity. Is that what you are taking credit for?
We are then treated to the exact same clip we saw earlier in the movie during Sinestro’s mid-movie speech. With the exception of planet shot mirrored, the movie doesn’t even try to hide it. Just look. See!
Hal gets back to Earth, kisses the girl, and goes “looking for trouble”. And that’s Green Lantern.
Oh yeah..and this:
Boy is this movie bad. Not, awful-awful. It’s watchable, but largely forgettable. It is as mediocre as mediocre can be. The plot is unfocused, the characters are bland, and they rush through some of the more high-concept stuff. The special effects can be kind of cool at times – I particularly liked what they did with the Green Lantern suit, but some of the other visuals can be incredibly dodgy at times.
The way this movie was executed reminds me of something from the mid-90s. Sci-Fi movies such as Supernova or Event Horizon which are not really all that good, but have become cult favorites. Granted, it is a different type of movie from those two, but Green Lantern sort of falls into that mold. Even the soundtrack sounds like “90s generic”. If this was made during that time period, I think people would be kinder to it. However, it was made in 2011 in the midst of a superhero movie renaissance where the competition is much stiffer and the critical eye more cynical.
The problem really lies with the script. The acting was pretty good. Ryan Reynolds was fine as Hal Jordan. I’m not one who thinks he was miscast. He just did the best he could with the material given which is a shame because there are a lot of things you could do with this fictional world. Peter Sarsgaard is clearly having the time of his life camping it up, and Blake Lively really turned out to be the welcomed surprise of the bunch.
In the end, the filmmakers were simply trying too hard when they didn’t need to. The Green Lanterns are basically space cops. Use that formula! It works and is easily accessible for mainstream audiences. Instead, the filmmakers felt like giving the finger to the audience by confusing the hell out of them.
Well, that’s my breakdown of Green Lantern. Again, if you liked this movie for whatever reason – great! I didn’t, and I feel it is one of the reasons I won’t be seeing a Flash movie anytime soon.
I hope you enjoyed my scene-by-scene breakdown! Do you want to see more posts like this? Sound off below and let me know what movies you want me to look at!
Continuing on from Part 2:
We learn that the Green Lantern Corps are not faring too well against Parallax. My question: if Parallax was defeated before by Abin Sur, why not do what he did? Clearly, it worked. Wouldn’t that be the first course of action? Or did Sur never write it down? The fact that Sur defeated Parallax is never really referenced again nor his method of doing so.
Hal then gets trained. And by trained, I mean thrown into the fire and sucker punched constantly. Is this really how they train new recruits, especially ones who *just* learned of the Green Lantern Corps existence? Seems harsh. Kilowog, in a completely throwaway line (which shouldn’t have been) mentions how the sun has gravity. Training complete!
Hal also meets Sinestro (with a name like that, I’m sure he isn’t evil) and the purple alien takes his anger out on Hal. He’s upset that Hal is disrespecting Abin-Sur’s memory by not being the perfect Green Lantern right away. Wouldn’t it make more sense for Sinestro, who revered Sur, would want to take Hal under his wing the way Sur did him? No, that’s too rational (and there wouldn’t be a movie if he didn’t outright reject Hal). Granted, it is misplaced anger, but Sinestro never acknowledges this (even after he takes a liking to Hal at the end).
Hal agrees that he sucks and goes home. For some reason, he is allowed to keep the ring. Why? Wouldn’t that be like letting a cop quit his job, but the force allowing him to keep his issued gun? That’s stupid. Plus, how long was Hal gone for? A couple of days, maybe? And no one notices him missing. Is disappearing for days on end common for Hal?
Meanwhile, Hammond begins hearing people’s thoughts and lives out every teacher’s fantasy by slapping his students around via telekinesis.
Later on, we are at a big party. Apparently the US military agreed to use the automatic planes shown at the beginning. Even though the military expressed enough disinterest in the project for Ferris Air to lay people off, we are given a nice hand-wave explanation on why this is happening. However, this plot element is completely worthless as the military having these planes as it doesn’t have any real impact on the story. Ah, whatever.
We also learn that Hal and Hammond know each other and clearly don’t like each other. Why, you may ask? Well, that is never established. I guess you can argue that Hammond is jealous of Hal since Hammond’s father treats Hal like a son, but we don’t know what Hal’s problem with Hammond is. They just act cold towards each other, even when Hal tries to subtly champion what Hammond does. Then again, Hal is a bit of a jerk, so perhaps that’s just Hal being Hal.
I guess my major problem is that we are an hour into the movie and this is the first time these characters are actually meeting. And, even more problematic, is that the movie is trying to shove some sort of backstory between the two. With only 40 minutes of movie left, it comes off a bit contrived. I feel we needed some of this rivalry earlier, and then build on it, so we can have some sort of reason to care when these two eventually go at it. I guess this is a minor point, but one that still bugs me. Maybe they should have put it in the opening narration with everything else.
Also, why is Hammond even at this party? Other than being the senator’s son, there is absolutely no reason for him to be there. And since he doesn’t like his father, even if he got an invite (which, logically, Hammon probably wouldn’t), why would he come to something that celebrates the senator? Oh, I know. Because the plot demanded he be there. And, I guess, to have a needless bit of him creeping on Carol.
So, the senator leaves the party and Hammond decides he’s had enough of his father by using his new powers to get his helicopter to crash. Of course, no one runs when they see this helicopter fall to the ground, then again, who would run from the slowest falling helicopter in the world? And of course, when it does hit the ground, no one gets shredded into bits from the propeller (even though numerous people are close by).
Hal jumps into action as Green Lantern and saves the helicopter by putting it on a toy race track. Earlier scene explained. I guess using a giant hand to grab it would have been too easy. Perhaps I’m being too critical. Wait, no I’m not!
Later, Hal visits Carol, who immediately recognizes him through his mask. I’ll give credit where credit is due. It is a funny bit.
Meanwhile, Hammond tweaks and gets a big head, literally, and the government nabs him. Of course, they cannot control him and chaos ensues. Fortunately, Hal’s ring senses it and he intervenes.
After some fisticuffs, Hector destroys the government compound (killing his father in the process). Of course, this goes unmentioned the rest of the movie. You’d think the government would send some sort of man hunt on either Hammond or the strange green guy floating around since they were sighted at the location. Then again, this is the same movie where the shadowy government agencies move at a snail’s pace. Good consistency.
In fact, this scene just sorta ends. Hal zaps Hammond across the room, Hammond screams in defeat (for some reason), and Hal just sits there catching his breath. Cut to next scene with Hal in his apartment. This is just incredibly lazy writing.
Tune in tomorrow for the “thrilling” conclusion!
Welcome to the second part of my scene-by-scene breakdown of 2011’s Green Lantern starring Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively. Continuing from Part 1:
Hal goes to his nephew’s birthday party and parks like an a-hole for no reason.
He discovers his nephew is sad at the near-miss Hal had that day. They have a really genuine heart-to-heart that really plays well. Renyonds and the kid have a good chemistry (and the kid isn’t that bad of a child actor). I bet this relationship will play off later in the movie.
Bawhahahahaha! Who am I kidding? We never see this kid again. Nothing of real value came from this scene other than the race car set.
Anyway, Hal is then abducted and brought to a crashed Abin Sur and is given Sur’s ring before the alien dies. Tom comes by to collect him right before the government comes by to see the downed alien ship.
Question: how long has it been since Sur crashed? The movie implies it’s been a few hours at least. Why did it take the feds that long to mobilize? Oh, wait. Because the script called for it. Silly me.
Also, is it me, or does Hal accept the fact that an alien died in front of him a bit too easily? Well, perhaps I’m just being too nitpicky. I should focus on the big things like Hal’s car. It should still be at his brother’s house. Wouldn’t his family notice—ah, who cares? We’re never going to see Hal’s family again.
Meanwhile, college professor Hector Hammond (Peter Sarsgaard) is recruited to look at the body of Abin Sur, now in the government’s custody. We learn that he was given the chance to look at the alien because his father is Senator Tim Robbins.
The strange thing (more so than everyone acting nonchalant that there is a FREAKIN’ ALIEN BODY just laying there) is that there doesn’t seem to be any other scientists on this project. I know there is Amanda Waller, but that seems to be it. Oh yeah, he also gets infected with yellow power. Gee, maybe having an assistant would have prevented that.
While that is going on, Hal mucks around with the lantern before going out drinking and getting into a fight. Apparently, his earlier showboating caused Ferris Air to not get the government contract prompting massive layoffs. Gee, his co-workers are mad at getting fired. Imagine that. Hal fights them off with the ring and is taken to the Green Lantern planet, Oa.
On Oa, we get an exposition dump of everything that was said during the opening narration. So, why was that opening narration needed? Beats me!
The one thing they don’t delve much into is the ring. Here is my problem with the ring. It is never really explained how it works. We are told that it can create anything the wearer imagines. But does that mean it takes on the complete properties of said item?
For instance, when Hal makes a gun, it fires bullets. Why would it do this? Are those bullets effective since they are not “attached” to the ring? Same with the necklace he later gives Carol. Is there a distance factor with the ring? Or when Hal makes the jets, they work as jets would with logical working jet engines.
This is fine, but the movie doesn’t explain that, and the ring’s functionality is left incredibly hazy. Can he make fictional items? Like what if he made the USS Enterprise and made it go to warp speed. Can the ring do that? If not, why? It can make fully functional jets. How does the ring know real items from fictional? One line probably would have solved this problem.
Remember when you were a kid and you played make-believe with your friends? And you would say how you would have a power, but then your friend would counter with a power that outdid your power, so you would come up with one that outdid your friend’s? And things would keep escalating with utter nonsense until someone throws down the “infinity” card? That is kinda how the ring is presented in here. And because of that, it makes the ring seem too powerful and that, willpower aside, limits the dramatic effectiveness of it.
Tomorrow: Part 3, in which Hal gets “trained” and Hammond goes crazy!
Welcome to our scene by scene breakdown of Green Lantern, the 2011 superhero flick starring Ryan Reynolds. I promised this entry well over a year ago. Sorry it took so long. Originally, I wanted to do a video breakdown, Nostalgic Critic style. Unfortunately, during editing (and, subsequently, pretty far into the project), I determined that it was not working. I simply do not have the voice or talent to pull something off as clever or interesting. I do want to add a video component to the Culture Cast someday, but it is not going to be today.
Anyway, Green Lantern — this movie is bad. Whatever potential it had, it completely squanders it. The truth of the matter is that it was not one big thing that destroyed the movie, but a lot of little, smaller things that just added up. Today, I am hoping go through the movie, scene by scene to see what just did not work.
One thing before we begin. If you liked this movie, great! These are just my opinions. I did not like it, and these are my reasons why. I do not think less of anyone who likes this movie. That is just arrogant, and I really try not to be. Without further ado, here is Green Lantern.
We start with an opening narration given by Tomar-Rey (who is voiced by Geoffrey Rush). This was my first warning sign of bad things to come. I am always leery of movies that try to cram a lot of information in some sort of opening narration or scroll.
Look at movies like Super Mario Bros. or Judge Dredd. I realize they are trying to get the viewer up to speed with the backstory, but it rarely works out. Especially so since they are forcing the audience to swallow these insane and goofy concepts. Green willpower? Yellow fear?
It’s laughable at face value. In a movie with space aliens, giant head creatures, and evil clouds, you need to ease your audience into these concepts. In a high concept movie such as it, you need to first ground it, and then bring on the crazy.
Look at the Star Wars movies. They did it right. None of the opening crawls wasted time on the history of the Jedi or Republic. It just told us what was going on in that particular moment. The rest was filled in as the movie went on.
I guess I would not go on about this so much considering that an hour later (when this stuff actually matters), the movie repeats everything established here. It is even said by the same character.
Anyway, we start out on “The Lost Planet” in the “Lost Sector”, even though people know where it is. We see some hapless aliens release Parallax, our principle villain. He then attacks Green Lantern Abin Sur. Sur gets away, but not before being gravely injured.
We then cut and meet our hero, Hal Jordan. And, since it is important to show him being an irresponsible douche, we get him trying to wrap a present while driving recklessly on his way to work (of which he is already late to).
Why is he wrapping the gift then? We see later on he has plenty of time before the party when he is standing around at work doing nothing. What went through his head when driving to work? “Hey, I’m late to work. I can’t think of a better time than now to wrap a present.”
The movie is trying too hard all at once to make him irresponsible. You can show it bit by bit. We the audience will get it.
So, Ferris Air is giving a demonstration about some new automatic planes they are trying to sell to the government. Hal and love-interest Carol (played by Blake Lively) are facing off against new technology to prove the new tech’s worth — I think.
It is never made clear what the goals and motivations are from the different people involved. Hal and Carol seem as if they need to show up the new unmanned planes. The higher-ups at Ferris Air want the unmanned planes to win (so they can get the lucrative government contract). And Tom, the guy who invented the new planes, seems happy when Hal wins against them.
Why does he get this excited over Hal winning? Especially in front of the generals, who the company hopes will buy the planes. That’s like Bill Gates being happy in front of investors that the next version of Windows fails.
So, as I mentioned, Hal wins against the new planes after a crazy maneuver. But, of course, he causes his plane to go out of control which, in turn, triggers the memory of his father’s death. Why is this here? It is totally shoehorned in. Does he get flashbacks like this often? Was it because he was in a dangerous situation? If so, why is he allowed to fly? You’d think that would come up during a psych test. Well, Hal ejects and his plane crashes.
We then cut to a scene where Hal gets chewed out, and I am left wondering why Hal couldn’t wait to wrap his nephew’s gift. I mean, they are all just standing around doing nothing.
Tomorrow: Part 2!
Failure has always been more appealing to me than success. When a film succeeds, it’s all well and good, but it can also be kind of boring. When a film fails, or even bombs, I find it so much more interesting. In this brand-new feature I will be exploring why certain films failed at the box office. I may feature up to three movies at a time, or just write extensively about one movie. I plan to make this a regular feature here at The Culture Cast, so I do hope you will enjoy it.
Released only a few short weeks ago, Battleship has managed to do less than 50 million at the domestic box office. Though it has grossed over 200 million worldwide, Battleship still looks to be a massive write-off for Universal on par with Disney’s John Carter (which I’m sure will be covered soon enough). After the enormous success of the Transformers movies (another Hasbro property), Battleship was poised to do humongous numbers, but fizzled out spectacularly. So, what exactly went wrong? Battleship seemed to be two parts Transformers and one part Pearl Harbor, only without Michael Bay (and Jerry Bruckheimer and Steven Spielberg and any interesting premise whatsoever). Turns out, it just ended up looking extremely generic.
Perhaps the biggest obstacle to the success of Battleship was that no one asked for this movie in the first place. Ostensibly based upon, but not resembling whatsoever, the classic children’s board game, Battleship seems like a movie created in an executive’s office by studio heads who *think* they know what the public wants, but who are very rarely correct (and when they are correct, it’s usually by sheer circumstance). Though Nick might cringe at this statement, Battleship was really something the fans (if they even exist in the first place) didn’t want. It didn’t help that the studio hired director-for-hire Peter Berg to make the film. Berg has absolutely no style as a director, adding to the film’s perceived blandness.
Marketing for Battleship was also disastrous. Universal seemed to go out of its way to feature Rihanna, a pop star more known for her awful music and dancing than her acting, in the film’s trailers and ads. Taylor Kitsch is the star of Battleship, but even Liam Neeson seemed to draw more screen time in commercials (and he only worked on the film for something like four days). Lastly, an hilarious Subway restaurant advertisement for the film attempted to buoy Battleship by proclaiming that the movie itself “has battleships” in it just in case the title wasn’t clear enough.
Green Lantern (2011)
What began as a film project for Kevin Smith (seriously) in 1997 finally came to theaters in what was then the far off year of 2011. The end product probably should have just been scrapped in the Clinton era. A woefully miscast Ryan Reynolds (and he actually drew positive notices for his performance) stars as Green Lantern Hal Jordan, fighting across the galaxy as a member of an elite group of space cops. While the Green Lantern comics have long been heralded as some of the best DC has to offer, the movie earned atrocious reviews and was absolutely devastated in the box office. So, what exactly went wrong? Green Lantern seemed doomed from the start. After Smith passed on the project, it languished in development hell for about ten years. At that point, Warner Bros. decided it would attempt to include all manner of Green Lantern mythos into the movie, ending up with a jumbled mess of a film that just did not work in a narrative sense.
Streamlining Green Lantern may have saved the film. Instead of attempting to bring in an everything-but-the-kitchen-sink approach, Warner Bros. probably should have stuck with the Geoff Johns mid-2000s Lantern stories as the basis for the film. A great trilogy could have easily been lifted from these works, culminating perhaps in an ambitious Blackest Night movie that would also potentially serve as DC’s answer to Marvel’s hugely successful The Avengers. But it was not to be.
An initial trailer for the film, released in November 2010, was met with absolute scorn on the internet. Warner later admitted the film wasn’t ready for such a showing (special effects were still incomplete at that time). The studio sank an additional nine million dollars into an already bloated budget of over 200 million in order to enhance the effects even further. The glut of complaints about Green Lantern, however, lay with the script. Almost universally described as “paper-thin,” Green Lantern’s story still managed to make almost zero sense in the eyes of critics. Ryan Reynolds, Geoffrey Rush, and Mark Strong (all actors received positive notices for their roles, especially Strong), were left out in the cold, and Warner took a huge loss on the project. Not even the international markets could stomach Green Lantern.
The Dilemma (2011)
After a somewhat extended break from the silver screen, Vince Vaughn seemed primed to return with the 2011 winter comedy release The Dilemma. Boasting a fine pedigree in director Ron Howard and an excellent supporting cast featuring a red-hot Kevin James (coming off a few megahits of his own), Queen Latifah, Channing Tatum, and Jennifer Connelly, The Dilemma had the potential to be a potent comedy hit. So, what exactly went wrong? For starters, marketing for this film suffered a huge blow when Vaughn made what many perceived to be an anti-gay remark in the trailer. Universal relented to a public outcry, removing the “joke” from the film’s trailer.
The damage had been done, however, as it turns out that not all publicity is good publicity. The Dilemma flopped at the box office, grossing only 48 million dollars domestically on a budget of 70 million. It was Kevin James’ first big disappointment at the box office since his ascent to the A-list. It was an obvious misfire for Vaughn, too, as his brand of comedy seemed to be seen as out-of-style when the film failed. Ron Howard, who had not helmed a hit comedy in over a decade at that point (and who has actually had quite a shoddy filmography recently) took yet another box office blow.
The Dilemma attempted to straddle the line between quirky, slap-stick humor and dark humor, and was soundly rejected by audiences. Few movies featuring primarily dark humor succeed at the box office, and The Dilemma was not an exception to this rule. Though the supporting cast was well-received, the movie’s inability to decide what it wanted to be as well as its disastrous marketing campaign ultimately cost it the box office highs of previous Vaughn, James, and Howard films.