Zack & Nick's Culture Cast

Digesting the lowest rung of pop culture so you don't have to!

“Spectre” – The Nick Review


Spectre is a frustrating movie.  I want to like it – I love Bond films – and to an extent, I do.  The film has some great action (like all Bond films do), and Daniel Craig is perfect as James Bond – he seems so comfortable in the role and really has made it his own while incorporating the trademarks of the character.  However, the film has so many issues that I would find it tough, as a fan, to sit down and sit through it multiple times.

The skull mask has been used heavily in marketing even though it has only two or three minutes of inconsequential screentime.

The skull mask has been used heavily in marketing even though it has only two or three minutes of inconsequential screen time.

Much of the problem with Spectre is that the story is incredibly over-plotted and becomes a bit too convoluted for its own good.  I am still not 100% sure what the villain’s ultimate goal was.  I get the fact that the Spectre organization was trying to manipulate world governments into creating an uber-surveillance system which would then allow them to have access to it as well.  But for what reason?  What evil plot are they going to do with it?  It is incredibly muddled on what the endgame is here.

But, I suppose that is minor when it comes to the other element of Spectre’s main villain, Oberhauser (a much underutilized Chrisoph Waltz).  He isn’t really menacing (mostly due to unclear plans and goals), and the film ham-fistedly tries to make a personal connection between him and Bond.  This revelation comes two-thirds of the way though the film, and it doesn’t land.  At all.  There is no emotional resonance in the connection because the film does nothing of substance with it.

There is more I can talk about Oberhauser as a character and the direction he is taken in, but I don’t want to spoil the film.  I will spoil this: you know he’s evil because he wears shoes without socks.  Only criminal masterminds do this.

Spectre is really ambitious in that it tries to connect all the Daniel Craig Bond films together as one massive, story arc.  I like this idea – in theory.  It just doesn’t quite work because the film doesn’t give enough explanation behind it.  I’m all for not spoon-feeding an audience, but something like this needs to be better defined and cleared-up for an audience to really accept it.  I’ve read elsewhere that there were scenes exploring this further, but were cut for time.  That’s a shame, because I would really have liked to see this angle explored more.

Speaking of time, Spectre is incredibly long at nearly 2.5 hours.  You feel the length.  The first half has way too many breadcrumbs for Bond to follow to effectively set-up the story and by the finale climax, you are ready for it to be over.  I can’t help but wonder if the film could have been streamlined, some of the plot issues could have been ironed out.

I feel bad dumping on Spectre, because there is stuff to like.  I was entertained for the most part.  The action sequences are great.  They are fun and though it doesn’t break new ground, they are very Bond.  Additionally, everything is shot very nicely.  Spectre is a beautiful film, and I love how it opens with a prolonged continuous shot (I’m a sucker for those).

Daniel Craig is in perfect form as James Bond.  He really seems really comfortable as the secret agent, and the writing team were finally able to make Craig a bit wittier with the wisecracks.  Up until now, I feel he has kind of struggled with that.  I also love how the Bond series is expanding the roles of the supporting characters (M, Q, Moneypenny, and Tanner), and making them part of the action.

Spectre can be fun at times, and it is worth seeing the spectacle on the big screen.  That said, there have been better Bond films and there have been worse.  Spectre was ambitious and I appreciate that they tried to tie-up some of the remaining Quantum organization plot threads from the earlier Craig films.  It just doesn’t land as well it probably could (and likely should) have.



3 responses to ““Spectre” – The Nick Review

  1. CultureCast-Z November 16, 2015 at 7:57 pm

    So I saw this over the weekend, and yeah … I hate to use this term, but “meh.” I have no idea why the production/writers/whatever cannot get any momentum to the Craig Bond films, and it’s particularly disheartening since Craig is arguably the best James Bond since Connery (even if I like a lot of the Moore films). Casino Royale was a very good “reboot” and then Quantum of Solace shit the bed (I know you and I like it more than most, but it is definitely a step back). Skyfall was a fantastic action movie and probably my favorite Bond film since GoldenEye, and it’s followed up by a limp noodle of a movie with a wet fart for a villain. I really hope Craig gets one more outing and that his final film as Bond blows us out of the water, because as it stands Sprectre just kinda blows.

    • Nick! November 16, 2015 at 10:27 pm

      The more I think about the movie, the more disappointed I am with it. The first two-thirds are pretty great (on the whole), but when we get into that third act, it just falls apart and it subsequently sours everything else. I honestly believe they didn’t know how to end the movie and became more interested in the “It’s all connected!” playground.

      I am surprised to hear you like some of the Moore films. I’d figure you’d like those least given how jokey and gadget-prone they were.

  2. Pingback: I Unfortunately Saw Spectre | Zack & Nick's Culture Cast

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: